Records these days are a rip off. I get that anything made in ‘limited’ quantities is going to have some sort of sliding cost structure associated with it, but it’s really about supply and demand. And the worst example of supply without demand is Ebay. I’m sure that Ebay has deals on certain things, but…wow, even their cd’s are overpriced. I’m not sure if anyone realizes this, but you can get most cd’s for pennies on the dollar. Records are a little harder to come by, but when the average cost on Ebay versus other seller sites (like Discogs) is 30-40% more per title, on average…who are these sellers? If overhead isn’t a cost concern, then sure, leave your record on there forever, but…where’s the logic in that? I thought the idea of selling something was to, you know, actually sell product. One problem I can see is that, since shortly after it’s launch, Discogs became the official ‘price guide’ for record stores and online sellers. Now, instead of pricing something to sell, nobody wants to go below the Discogs minimum listed price. And Ebay sellers seem to take that and immediately add 20%. But hey, if you need something now, this minute, I suppose that’s what Ebay is there for. Otherwise, if you’re already into the hobby, or just getting into the hobby, be very careful with your dollars. Here’s a nice post about cost aggregating. Don’t get me wrong, I’m not here to bash on Ebay, but when it comes to their vinyl pricing, yeah, I guess I am. But that’s not down to the website, it’s down to the sellers operating there.